A Question Of Judgment: Meg Whitman Laughs At Pornography

by Karen England, National Committeewoman, California Republican Assembly

Meg Whitman’s promotion of pornography shows that she does not have the judgment, character, or values necessary to be governor of California and the face of the California Republican Party.

For months, conservatives have had plenty of reasons to doubt Meg Whitman’s values and judgment.  Whitman supports abortion on demand for minors and has vowed to continue abortion funding at taxpayer expense.  Whitman is worlds apart from conservatives on these fundamental values issues.

To counter questions about her qualifications, Whitman has based her candidacy on her tenure at eBay.  But when conservatives hone in on her controversial decision to create an “adults only” eBay site and facilitate the sale of pornography, she laughs.  She denies that this issue of judgment and values is relevant to the gubernatorial election.

Whitman’s liberal defenders argue that she didn’t sell pornography, she merely set up a market and let users decide what to sell.  According to this flawed argument, because conservatives are supposed to favor “markets,” we shouldn’t criticize Whitman about pornography.

The truth is that Whitman set rules and made decisions about what items would be available on the eBay site.  And if conservatives are serious about protecting culture, we have to ask business leaders to take responsibility when they promote pornography and seek profits at the expense of society.

Around the same time that Whitman set up her “adults only” site, she also instituted a complete ban on the sale of guns on eBay.

She later wrote that her decision to ban guns was one of her “least difficult decisions” and said that gun owners would “cut corners” and facilitate gun crimes.  Whitman apparently didn’t have any such qualms about the potential consequences of hardcore pornography, even though it later turned out that the “adults only” eBay site was used in connection with sex crimes.  

When a reporter asked Whitman about the eBay pornography site, she laughed.

Whitman should be a little less gleeful about her role and recognize that this is a serious issue.  She aided the distribution of pornography and sexual paraphernalia, profiting from an industry that degrades women, glamorizes obscene acts, and encourages promiscuity.  While there’s no reason to believe that Whitman was involved in the manufacture of the material sold on her “adults only” site, she clearly facilitated its dissemination.  She needs to take responsibility for the fact that there is more pornography in America today because she created the “adults only” eBay.

Whitman’s refusal to even take the issue seriously should be a red flag for conservatives.  We are concerned about the sexualizing of American culture.  We are worried about our children and grandchildren being exposed to depictions of sexual behavior.  And we know that sexualized culture leads to behavior and attitude changes that increase the number of premarital pregnancies and abortions.  These are genuine concerns for California families, and we need a governor who understands them.

I don’t believe that California has ever had a Republican nominee for governor who profited from the degradation of women.  Let’s not start now.

Published in: on May 27, 2010 at 7:09 pm  Leave a Comment  

Placer County Republican Central Committee

District 1
You can vote for up to four.  I am recommending that you vote for only these two for PCRCC District 1

CHERYL BLY-CHESTER
CAROLE VAILLANCOURT

District 2
You can vote for up to six.  I am recommending that you vote for only these three for PCRCC District 2

SPENCER SHORT
WILLIE PRESTON
KEN CAMPBELL

District 4
You can vote for up to four.  I am recommending that you vote for only these two for PCRCC District 4

KAREN ENGLAND
JUNE C. MOORE

Published in: on May 26, 2010 at 6:39 pm  Leave a Comment  

Karen’s Choices

I believe we are at a critical time in our county and state.  For the first time in years, I believe social conservatives can make a huge difference in the June 8th Primary.  The two most important offices are Governor and Attorney General!   

Well, my race for PCRCC is important to too. :-)

After much thought, research and prayer I will be casting my vote for the following people who are running for a variety of offices.  At the bottom of the statewide races are local Placer races if you are interested.

GOVERNOR; Republican Party
Steve Poizner

Lieutenant Governor; Republican Party
Sam Aanestad

Secretary of State; Republican Party
Undecided

Controller; Republican Party
Tony Strickland

Treasurer; Republican Party
Mimi Walters

Attorney General; Republican Party
John Eastman

Insurance Commissioner; Republican Party
Brian Fitzgerald

U.S. Senate
Chuck DeVore

Congressional District #4
Tom McClintock

State Board of Equalization; District 2; Republican Party
George Runner

State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Lydia  A. Gutierrez

Placer County Republican Central Committee

District 1
You can vote for up to four.  I am recommending that you vote for only these two for PCRCC District 1

CHERYL BLY-CHESTER
CAROLE VAILLANCOURT

District 2
You can vote for up to six.  I am recommending that you vote for only these three for PCRCC District 2

SPENCER SHORT
WILLIE PRESTON
KEN CAMPBELL

District 4
You can vote for up to four.  I am recommending that you vote for only these two for PCRCC District 4

KAREN ENGLAND :-)
JUNE C. MOORE

State Senate

District 4
Doug La Malfa, Republican

State Assembly

Assembly District 3
Dan Logue, Republican

Assembly District 4
Ted Gaines, Republican

Assembly District 5
Craig DeLuz, Republican

PLACER CO. SUPERVISOR District 1
“ROCKY” ROCKHOLM

PLACER CO. AUDITOR- CONTROLLER
CASEY TANNER

Published in: on May 25, 2010 at 8:32 pm  Comments (1)  

MEG WHITMAN: THE WOMAN WHO WILL SAY OR DO ANYTHING TO GET ELECTED GOVERNOR

Meg Whitman isn’t just a radical abortion-rights advocate – she’s also disingenuous and misinformed.  And she will say or do anything to get elected, including smearing Steve Poizner. 
 
Let’s set the record straight.  Whitman currently supports taxpayer-funded abortions and refuses to endorse this year’s Parental Notification initiative.  We’re not talking about positions she took four years ago, or even two years ago.  These are positions she has taken during her current campaign for governor.
 
Yesterday, a misinformed Whitman surrogate suggested that Meg Whitman was against taxpayer-funded abortions, yet, in a personal conversation I had with her not too long ago, Whitman told me that she thought that abortions were a “right” and that the government was entitled to provide all women with the funding necessary to exercise their “right” to abort an unborn child.
 
Radical abortion-rights advocate Whitman also stated that same sentiment in an interview with Jon Fleischman, saying that she supports public funding of abortions because it would be, “…unfair to women who cannot afford an abortion.”
 
That’s right – Meg Whitman said, “I support public funding” and she also said in the same interview that an abortion “needs to be available to all women, and whether you are rich or poor.”  She again, in that interview, called taxpayer-funded abortion a “right.”
 
Simply put, Meg Whitman isn’t just pro-abortion rights, she’s a radical advocate who does not share the values of social conservatives in California.  She’s out of touch and out of step with the vast majority of Republicans in our state.
 
In contrast, Steve Poizner is opposed to taxpayer-funded abortions.  He opposes partial-birth abortions.  And he has enthusiastically endorsed the Parental Notification initiative currently being circulated for voter approval.  His position on abortion is crystal-clear and while I may not agree with all of his positions, past or present, I can say in good conscience that Steve Poizner is committed to driving the number of abortions in our state to zero and opposes forcing taxpayers to fund abortions.  Steve shares our values and will work with social conservatives as governor to ensure that these values are protected.
 
Meg Whitman should be ashamed of herself for smearing Steve Poizner with tens of millions of dollars in negative advertising.  She should also be ashamed of her efforts to cover up and misinform voters about her radical pro-abortion positions.  How can a candidate take such a “principled” stance in favor of taxpayer-funded abortions only to claim to believe something completely differently just a few months later?  She has lied to voters about her beliefs, and those of her opponent.  And we must do everything we can to stop her from being our party’s nominee for governor.
 
I’m endorsing Steve Poizner for governor because I believe he’s the only candidate who is committed to opposing the public funding of abortion and to standing up for the values that social conservatives believe in.

Published in: on May 24, 2010 at 11:24 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.